Hey, if your son is working for a bank moving dark money around and you write a Supreme Court decision about dark money, is it still valid?
After Citizens United was argued and before it was decided, Justin Kennedy resigned and started his own fund. Real estate securities. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704194504575031432334629708 …
Real estate was used to launder foreign money in to the Trump campaign.
A have a feeling there is more to the story of Citizens United...and the financial crisis...and Trump-Russia. </>
OH WOW, I TOTES FORGOT, Deutsche Bank was laundering RUSSIAN money and this involved MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES! LIKE JUSTIN WORKED ON! http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/31/investing/deutsche-bank-us-fine-russia-money-laundering/index.html …
So I ask again, if your son works for a launderer of Russian money and you write a Supreme Court decision that allows Russians to launder money into our campaigns, is that still the law? Because it seems dodgy. 🧐
You can follow @ericgarland.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.