Eric Garland+ Your Authors @ericgarland Intelligence analyst and advisor to CEOs and governments. I break down global events into clear narratives and appropriate profanity. Jun. 28, 2018 1 min read + Your Authors

Hey, if your son is working for a bank moving dark money around and you write a Supreme Court decision about dark money, is it still valid?

Because Justice Kennedy's son Justin was working in Mortgage Backed Securities at Deutsche Bank when Citizens United was argued.

After Citizens United was argued and before it was decided, Justin Kennedy resigned and started his own fund. Real estate securities. 

Real estate was used to launder foreign money in to the Trump campaign.

A have a feeling there is more to the story of Citizens United...and the financial crisis...and Trump-Russia. </>

OH WOW, I TOTES FORGOT, Deutsche Bank was laundering RUSSIAN money and this involved MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES! LIKE JUSTIN WORKED ON! 

So I ask again, if your son works for a launderer of Russian money and you write a Supreme Court decision that allows Russians to launder money into our campaigns, is that still the law? Because it seems dodgy. 🧐

You can follow @ericgarland.


Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Since you’re here...

... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.

Follow Threader