Sexy NASA genetic algorithm recommends killing 2/3 of crew so remaining crew will survive longer
Perhaps some explanation is in order.
Came across anecdote here: https://www.gwern.net/Tanks
"NASA Mars mission planning, optimizing food/water/electricity consumption for total man-days survival, yields an optimal plan of killing 2/3 crew & keep survivor alive as long as possible"
Reference, though, is this single forum post with no names or dates: https://lobste.rs/s/1d7whd/tales_from_trenches_ai_disaster_stories#c_le6tsr …
It does seem more plausible than some anecdotes, though. The framework and survival length thresholds match those in this paper (which doesn't use a GA but suggests it as a possible future approach). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110008543.pdf …
(If anyone knows of a reference that will confirm this anecdote, please please let me know!)
You can follow @JanelleCShane.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.