Sexy NASA genetic algorithm recommends killing 2/3 of crew so remaining crew will survive longer
Perhaps some explanation is in order.
Came across anecdote here: https://www.gwern.net/Tanks
"NASA Mars mission planning, optimizing food/water/electricity consumption for total man-days survival, yields an optimal plan of killing 2/3 crew & keep survivor alive as long as possible"
Reference, though, is this single forum post with no names or dates: https://lobste.rs/s/1d7whd/tales_from_trenches_ai_disaster_stories#c_le6tsr …
It does seem more plausible than some anecdotes, though. The framework and survival length thresholds match those in this paper (which doesn't use a GA but suggests it as a possible future approach). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110008543.pdf …
(If anyone knows of a reference that will confirm this anecdote, please please let me know!)
You can follow @JanelleCShane.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.