Mueller did indict him on Aiding and Abetting.
What else is 18 US Section 2 doing in the heading?
He didn't elaborate on the evidence backing it up, but there are hints.
All the evidence does not have to go into a charging doc.
See next tweet for screen shot.
Here's the screen shot of the indictment.
Section 2 is at the end, but it isn't a typo because it's mentioned again in paragraph 41. Besides, there will not be a typo.
Here's what section 2 means: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2 …
Also, there is plenty of evidence here of aiding and abetting.
Aiding and abetting implies a larger interpose with other principals.
Okay so what about that "was directed"👇?
Who did the directing? And who were those senior campaign folks?
cont. . .
There just isn't a separate heading gathering the evidence together.
There's also evidence of aiding and abetting a cyber crime (see 👇conspiracy to disseminate hacked emails)
But the aiding and abetting seems to be about obstruction (Paragraph 41.)
You can follow @Teri_Kanefield.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.