Lots of talk that virtual MVPDs won't save Pay-TV. This shouldn't surprise - vMVPDs need to prove they address four problems. They're still 0 for 4.
Thus any price increases devastate growth (but are critical as most services are gross margin negative).
What are those problems: (1) That they solve a consumer want/need - pricing and access isn't why viewership is imploding; (2) They're better than substitutes like Netflix - which are killing viewing; (3) They discourage suppliers from going D2C; (4) The economics are sustainable
vMVPDs will survive and replace traditional MVPDs. They are cheaper (no installation, repair trucks, hardware), more accessible and easier to use.
But their prices will continue to grow.
So they end up being marginally cheaper versions of the old thing.
Audiences aren't leaving MVPDs because they are a *little* too pricey, or a *little* too hard to use or a *little* hard to use on other devices
That's okay! 50MM+ homes will have Pay-TV in a decade. That's still $100B a year. But it's still the old thing.
And here's YouTube TV with a 25% price hike after DirecTV Now cranked up its prices and reduced what you got for it. https://venturebeat.com/2019/04/10/google-hikes-youtube-tv-price-from-40-to-50/ …
You can follow @ballmatthew.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.