Asha Rangappa @AshaRangappa_ Fmr FBI Special Agent, lawyer, faculty @JacksonYale. Tiger(ish) mom. @CNN analyst. Editor @just_security. Karaoke, golf, and Shakespeare aficionado. Views mine. Mar. 12, 2019 1 min read

LINT. Some questions I added to the application when I was dean of admissions @YaleLawSch because of unequal access to resources (like expensive "admissions consultants"):

1. Did you receive any assistance in preparing your application? If so, please specify.

2. Did you take a test preparation course? If so, please specify.

3. Are you a first generation college student, or first generation professional school student?

4. Questions like above increase transparency in admissions and help people making decisions compare apples to apples. I was shocked to find that many colleges and law schools do not ask these questions (especially #1 and #2). When I asked why --

5. I was told OTR that schools are afraid of "upsetting people" (not sure if this meant donors, admissions consultants, or what). IMO admissions committees have a duty to reveal the playing field as much as possible, and if that means asking for more info, so be it.

*level the playing field (but also reveal -- offering tips and advice directly to applicants is also democratizing the process)


You can follow @AshaRangappa_.



Bookmark

____
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.