This piece by @LFFriedman & @MaggieAstor is interesting -- really great idea. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/us/politics/climate-change-democrats.html …
One beef, though. This -- "a carbon tax, which economists widely view as the most effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions" -- is not true! Lots of (not all) economists agree a tax is the most efficient (not effective) way. CO2 taxes have notably *not* been effective.
OK one other thing: I'd love to see the candidates asked about a national 100% clean energy standard.
You can follow @drvox.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.