I'm mystified by how media is reporting Rosenstein's recent Trump-Russia comments. *The* headline from the ABA dinner—the only one that matters—is that a Trump-nominated Deputy AG just implied that it's *Congress's job* to "render conclusive factual findings."
OK, then—let's go!
1/ People took Rosenstein's comments as unhelpful to the search for justice in the Trump-Russia case, as he—falsely—criticized Obama. But we have to stay focused: Rosenstein is *all in* on claims Mueller's report was *not* intended to be conclusive, and Congress needs to step in.
2/ The first question to William Barr in the Senate should be, "Your deputy, Rod Rosenstein, whose work on the Trump-Russia investigation you have repeatedly praised, says it isn't DOJ's role to 'render conclusive factual findings.' Do you agree that that's Congress's role, now?"
3/ Barr might say no to that—though it requires contradicting Rosenstein—but if he says no, you just ignore him. But if he says—on *national TV*—that it's Congress's role to "render conclusive factual findings," you've just gotten Trump's AG to *endorse* months of House hearings.
You can follow @SethAbramson.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.