"Stare decisis does not compel continued adherence to this erroneous precedent.”
Translation for non-lawyers: "We don't have to follow precedents we disagree with." This may water down the concept of "precedent."
Justice Breyer's dissent concludes: "Today's decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the court will overrule next."
Translation for non-lawyers: "I'm not saying you should necessarily freak out yet, but I'm not saying it would be unreasonable to freak out."
You can follow @waltshaub.