Jennifer Cohn @jennycohn1 Election security advocate & writer; attorney; Contributor @WhoWhatWhy, @NYRDaily #HandMarkedPaperBallots #ProtectOurVotes 🆘 May. 29, 2019 1 min read

Mueller owes the public, his CLIENT, a duty to explain why he apparently concluded this was NOT evidence of a conspiracy:

“Manafort suspected of sharing polling data with associate linked to Russian intelligence.” 1/  https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/424380-redaction-error-in-court-filing-reveals-manafort-shared-polling-info 

As @UNSEATpac points out, we know that Manafort shared the polling data only because of a flawed redaction in one of the indictments. Why was this redacted in the first place? Was Mueller NEVER going to tell the public?! If so, why? 2/

If it’s because it’s part of the counter-intelligence investigation, then Mueller should explain that there WAS evidence of a conspiracy but he did not include it because it is part of the counter-intelligence investigation. 3/


You can follow @jennycohn1.



Bookmark

____
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Become member.