Asha Rangappa @AshaRangappa_ Fmr FBI Special Agent, lawyer, faculty @JacksonYale. Tiger(ish) mom. @CNN analyst. Editor @just_security. Karaoke, golf, and Shakespeare aficionado. Views mine. Jun. 04, 2019 1 min read

Uh, this is an intellectually lazy argument, @brithume. You asked what’s the difference. The difference is that one was conducted at the behest of a single individual (Hoover). The other was conducted through a tripartite process involving checks and oversight. Big difference. 1/

This like saying that the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan was “the same” as the impeachment of Bill Clinton. Both attempted to remove a POTUS. One was done by a rogue crazy person wielding a gun. The other was done through a process outlined in the Constitution. 2/

Even if you believe (as many do) that the latter was done based on a flimsy premise, for political reasons, and an abuse of power, describing Clinton’s impeachment as an “attempted assassination” would be...well, stupid, inflammatory, and wrong.

Words have meanings. Learn them.

You can follow @AshaRangappa_.


Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.