Interesting development: Oberlin admin Merideth Raimondo, who was previously censorious ( https://apnews.com/beec64e2e509491d9d0b7e4b043b5cf7 …) now claims mantle of free speech as a defense ( https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/09/us/oberlin-college-bakery-lawsuit/index.html …). This is one reason consistency in the application of liberal principles is so important. 1/
More subtlety is required in these matters. It's not just that free speech is a principle & not just a 1A issue, nor that free speech doesn't mean free from consequences. But also that free speech does not subsume harassment or defamation (of non-public figures), etc. 2/
For more on the Oberlin case and the complexities and longstanding distinctions about speech that it involves, see this fine, short essay by @DavidAFrench https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/06/the-oberlin-trial-is-a-blueprint-for-fighting-back/amp/?__twitter_impression=true …
You can follow @NAChristakis.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.