I wish @VerifiedVoting & others would stop using the phrase “voter marked paper ballots,” which means either HAND marked or MACHINE-MARKED. The phrase is thus ambiguous & confusing. If VV supports #HandMarkedPaperBallots as a primary voting system, it should say so. 1/
If it doesn’t, it should say so & acknowledge that this is a controversial position & that the most popular machine-marked paper ballots use unverifiable barcodes & abbreviated text, which NASEM says is “virtually unusable for verifying voter intent.” 2/
Quote from NASEM: 3/
Link to the NASEM report: https://www.nap.edu/read/25120/chapter/6 … 4/
As noted, the most popular BMDs (E.g., The ES&S ExpressVote & ExpressVote XL) also count votes w/ barcodes, which voters can’t read and thus can’t verify. 5/
This is the type of system enabled by ambiguous “voter marked paper ballot” messaging. https://whowhatwhy.org/2019/01/11/georgia-poised-to-pick-vulnerable-barcode-voting-technology/ … 6/
We must not let the “devil” of ambiguity undermine meaningful election-security reform. #HandMarkedPaperBallots 10/
You can follow @jennycohn1.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.