There's a big difference between what's important and what gets talked about
Violent individual anecdotes or the latest caprice of a powerful boor get unending front pages, but the trends that shape our history get virtually no coverage
This is true for AI research too -- the attention of the community is constantly being captured by shiny objects, but these are not the ideas and results that will be retrospectively understood as having shaped the field
The worst thing you can do as a researcher is to be constantly moving from one shiny object to the next, and never stop to consider the important questions
This is perhaps exacerbated by social media, which not only directs our attention to the wrong things, but also creates an incentive system where you get rewarded for "contributing" to the latest fad or controversy
You can follow @fchollet.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.