Adam Klasfeld @KlasfeldReports Reporter, @CourthouseNews: NYC+Int’l. RTs=What's it to ya? adam[at]adamklasfeld[dot]com PGP Fingerprint: F427 EE3B 6F05 E5D5 785B 775B 2C74 683C 219D 91DC Jun. 27, 2019 1 min read

Julián Castro's remarks on eliminating section 1325--and treating immigration as a civil rather than criminal issue--was one of those paradigm shift moments that set the terms of the debate.

If that isn't explained and explored in depth after tonight, that's an abdication.

Other than abolishing private health insurance--where only Warren and de Blasio raised their hands--there doesn't seem to have been a moment of defining disagreement quite like that in this debate so far.

And that issue has had far, far less of a public airing.

It's just a marker: Beyond the stump speeches, where do the candidates stand on specific policy proposals that will shape the country. Castro seems to have moved the national conversation with that line and his aggressive challenge of his rivals, particularly Beto, on that issue.

At one point, Castro said that Trump justified the family separation policy on that statute. True, in that it was the fig leaf for the "zero tolerance" message his admin wanted to send.

Trump White House press release from last year.

The moderator, by the way, did a fantastic job of bringing the wonkery around that statute down to earth. Essentially, defining this as: Is this a civil or criminal issue?

You can follow @KlasfeldReports.


Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.