Good god, this is just a case study in how the bland, "neutral" tone of mainstream journalism fails to communicate the significance of events to readers. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/28/us/oregon-climate-fight.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fclimate&action=click&contentCollection=climate®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront …
At no point in that story are readers told the extremely simple fact that *Democrats organized & elected more representatives & have a goddamn supermajority*. They got more votes. LOTS more votes. In a democracy, that's supposed to mean victory!
Instead, just a bunch of talk about whether it's politically savvy, with plenty of chances for the Republicans *who are shitting on democracy* to frame their move in the best possible light, while lefties wring their hands & lament abstract "divisiveness." Feh. Feh to all of it.
Also, the NYT story makes absolutely no mention of this rathe significant dynamic: https://expo.oregonlive.com/news/g66l-2019/06/885b66848a3905/polluters-hit-by-oregon-climate-bill-gave-big-koch-industries-was-one-of-the-biggest.html …
You can follow @drvox.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.