The whole "don't worry, Pelosi knows what she's doing" line is looking increasingly strained. I cannot imagine any coherent strategic rationale for repeatedly trying to kneecap the most compelling voices in your party.
Sometimes feels like Dem leaders only speak to either Howard Schultz or the proverbial guy in the diner. Rich white guy or poor white guy. "Don't worry, we've got these upstarts in hand, we won't be pressured into imposing the accountability we promised during the election."
As long as the (often imagined/projected) instincts & assumptions of the white guy in the diner are taken as normative & determinative in US politics -- the farther you stray from there, the fewer votes you get -- this shit will continue.
Basically Dem leadership has a model in their heads: to the extent they behave like an opposition party, they increase their risk of losing. Undue ambition, undue oversight, unduly harsh words, all these are imagined to put the vaunted purple district (ie the majority) at risk.
You can follow @drvox.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.