Khanoisseur 🐶🤦🏻‍♂️🌎 @Khanoisseur Nonpartisan fact-checks + analysis of news (+ 🐶 pics). *Turn notifications on* (Podcast coming). Stuff for @Google @Twitter @Uber @Facebook @Tesla Aug. 23, 2019 1 min read

The cost-benefit calculation isn’t that simple: China benefits from US intellectual property, US benefits from cheap Chinese labor + outsourcing environmental damage/pollution and negative public health impacts associated with manufacturing goods in China–goods that US consumes.

2. If we were to somehow bring all manufacturing that China does for US to US, do we have workers here willing to work in factories? Doubtful. Increasingly Americans want jobs that are intellectually challenging and which allows them more time to play around on social media.

3. And what would this shift of manufacturing do to US/CO2 emissions? Would states that are meeting Paris Accord goals still be able to comply? What would that mean for energy prices? Will they skyrocket because we now need to buy more oil, produce more coal to power factories?

4. Much of the manufacturing that China does for US companies is powered by burning coal and oil (which it obtains from Iran and Saudi Arabia) - the resulting pollution has forced Chinese authorities to shut down many coal plants in recent months.


You can follow @Khanoisseur.



Bookmark

____
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.