You know that thing of how writers/publishers take a good phrase out of a terrible review to publicise a book? I think this might be the most brazen example of that I've ever seen. The review in question, which she of course hasn't linked to, calls her out as a cheap fraud.
Rightly so, as well. Here's the review: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/29/books/review/cia-books.html … Most writers would either dispute such damaging claims, or hang their heads in shame at being found out. Not Annie Jacobsen. She just blithely carries on, taking her publisher with her.
As someone pointed out to me yesterday, newspapers often publish retractions and corrections, and are in serious trouble if they get stuff wrong - or make things up. But book publishers apparently don't. That NYT review should see Little Brown look into this book. But it won't.
The situation is in fact much worse than even @SpyTalker's damning NYT review - I am guessing partly for legal reasons. Here's a thread in which I show multiple fabrications by Jacobsen, including in a book that was shortlisted for the Pulitzer:
You can follow @JeremyDuns.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.