You know that thing of how writers/publishers take a good phrase out of a terrible review to publicise a book? I think this might be the most brazen example of that I've ever seen. The review in question, which she of course hasn't linked to, calls her out as a cheap fraud.
Rightly so, as well. Here's the review: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/29/books/review/cia-books.html … Most writers would either dispute such damaging claims, or hang their heads in shame at being found out. Not Annie Jacobsen. She just blithely carries on, taking her publisher with her.
As someone pointed out to me yesterday, newspapers often publish retractions and corrections, and are in serious trouble if they get stuff wrong - or make things up. But book publishers apparently don't. That NYT review should see Little Brown look into this book. But it won't.
The situation is in fact much worse than even @SpyTalker's damning NYT review - I am guessing partly for legal reasons. Here's a thread in which I show multiple fabrications by Jacobsen, including in a book that was shortlisted for the Pulitzer:
You can follow @JeremyDuns.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.