Stephen Wolf+ Your Authors @PoliticsWolf @DKElections staff writer covering voting rights, gerrymandering, maps, & poli sci. Get the Voting Rights Roundup weekly newsletter Sep. 10, 2019 1 min read + Your Authors

1. Since North Carolina's GOP state legislative gerrymanders were struck down, I've wondered what nonpartisan maps could look like that didn't concede the GOP's county groupings as "optimal" under Stephenson v. Bartlett, unlike the ongoing litigation. Turns out ... #NCpol

2. @jcmattingly et al used an algorithm to devise the optimal county groupings that satisfied NC's "whole county provision" as interpreted by the (then a GOP-majority) NC Supreme Court in 2003's Stephenson v. Bartlett. The GOP's gerrymanders were "optimal," but so were other maps

3. This graphic of southeastern NC state House districts compares the GOP's illegal gerrymanders (left), a hypothetical nonpartisan replacement that keeps the GOP's county groupings (center), & a nonpartisan map that uses @jcmattingly et al's alternate county groupings (right)

4. Either of the nonpartisan maps shown here is fairer than the GOP's gerrymander. However, using the GOP's county groupings means a nonpartisan map could make #HD46 Trump+8% & #HD20 Trump+9%, both much bluer than the illegal districts. By contrast ...

5. The version that uses the alternate county groupings makes #HD46 Trump+6%, which is 2% bluer than when keeping the GOP's county groupings, & #HD19 takes #HD20's place as Wilmington's competitive seat at Trump+15%, which the incumbent would've almost lost in 2018

Anyway, here's the link to @jcmattingly & his co-authors' paper on county groupings in North Carolina legislative redistricting under Stephenson v. Bartlett, which demonstrates how these rules work as interpreted by the NC Supreme Court last decade 

Thought you may find this thread interesting 👆

You can follow @PoliticsWolf.


Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Since you’re here...

... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.

Follow Threader