Now that we know Russia potentially had a technical advantage circa 2011 in SIGINT and device breaches...is this why Team Trump was so brazen, not caring what evidence they left? 🤔
I mean, Flynn ran an intelligence agency, but he didn't protect his conversations with the Russian ambassador. Nor did he stop yammering about the nuclear plan.
Did he just think Russia had won definitively? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/04/michael-flynn-timeline-former-national-security-adviser-trump …
Flynn bragged about the "army of digital soldiers" and a successful "insurgency" against US democracy, backed by Russia.
He looks pretty confident. Were the Russian breaches why? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2MgTd3LgB0 …
It didn't last long, but is that why these traitors were so brazen about meeting up with foreign agents and using consumer-trash devices for their conversations?
That's suicidally dumm, but it at least makes sense.
You can follow @ericgarland.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.