Wondering if your tool qualifies as observability? I wrote out the full technical spec for debugging unknown-unknowns, and the reasoning behind each requirement.
This is well over a year of blood, sweat and toil. It all looks so simple and obvious written down like this. 😓
I am very curious how this hypebeast of a platform newrelic just shipped measures up. Does anyone know? 🤔
It's extremely unclear from the marketing material, tho they yap about pillars a lot which is a bad sign. pillars are what vendors say to try and change the subject.
Pillars are what vendors talk about when they're thinking "oh thank god, I can buy my way out of this shithole"
Pillars are what vendors talk about when they only know how to win contracts by having the longest checklist of useless features.
If database vendors talked about their product the way monitoring and logging vendors do, they'd be out there proudly bragging about having the myisam, csv, and blackhole storage engines
You can follow @mipsytipsy.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.