Gray said he passed the FMS. Stu had him set up w/ battling ropes in the EXOS foundation position - the 1/4 squat. As he started w/ the ropes Stu immediately declared he failed & was not qualified for load.
Of course by now it was even hotter. It was mid afternoon & the maintenance crew had been called but wasn’t coming. The 3 of us retreated to the Green Room during a break. We waited & waited. I kept asking when are they coming. Gray said it was too hot to continue.
Finally, the AC kicked on. We returned for a Q & A and a final talk by me. The Q&A included questions to Gray like “would you change the FMS?” To which he was so humble. “I’m so proud my baby got so much scientific attention.”
He said if he had to do it over he’d change the scoring. This was the highlight of the day for me. I was a die-hard advocate of precision form which is part of many corrective exercise systems like Stu’s & DNS. Both of which I had promoted & taught for years.
Why everyone wondered & more so which element to cut out?
❇️ Certainly not the 0, we need that as that indicates a clinical issue.
❇️ Probably merge the 1 & 2. Since they are both painless dysfunctions.
❇️ Not the 3 since that’s perfect form.
Yes, he suggested if he could do it again he’d merge 2 of the #s. But, while on the surface this didn’t seem so revolutionary what he said next has changed my career ever since.
Instead of merging the 1 & 2 he said he’d merge the 2&3. His reason was so classic Gray - making the hard easy. Calling the 2s dysfunctional led people to over-correct rather then addressing the “low hanging fruit” of the 1s & then moving on to loading people.
I am 💯 guilty of this as I had helped create a cottage industry of clinicians & coaches managing people away from load. Rehab purgatory. Correcting every dysfunction instead of addressing what’s in the basement & then building up GPP.
Funny thing happened to me later. I was writing my Functional Training Handbook (FTH) book & was studying skill acquisition. I realized internal cues were not as effective as external cues - Gab Wulf’s work (pre-order @NickWinkelman ‘s new book!). https://www.amazon.com/Functional-Training-Handbook-Craig-Liebenson/dp/1582559201 …
Then I remembered what Pr Janda taught me. Avoid conscious correction of faulty movement patterns. Damn I had gotten so into teaching “correct” Movement Patterns - or controlling them - that I forgot how Vlad said people learn!
Pavel spoke against “correctives” in Easy Strength which I quote in FTH. I immersed myself in Davids’ work on ecological validity & motor learning. Newall’s work on DST and constraints-based motor learning.
Now I see how the riddle of combining the Bio & the Psycho in a person-centered approach is solved by the Social or environmental context. The dichotomization on social media of biomechanics & pain science is an unnecessary dead end.
The Social is the athlete-centered or patient-centered milieu that breaks down the silos. @Peter_Stilwell @MattLowPT Diana Vaz.
Creating an environment which challenges the person at the edge of their capability is the key. Then the person problem solves rather than the trainer or clinician “fixing it”. They gain self-efficacy, resilence & robustness. Sustainable athleticism for healthy longevity.
I learned so much that day. Those that travelled from all over the world & came together in the spirit of #bealearnitallnotaknowitall that was what it was all about. What a treat. #firstprinciplesofmovement #ncds @WHO @PainRevolution 🙏
You can follow @CraigLiebenson.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.