These R(e) estimates are implausibly precise. The credible intervals, if shown, would take up the most of this plot. A move from .89 to .86, in the case of South Dakota for example, is meaningless, even though it’s shown as one of the biggest changes. 1/
Many of these estimations don’t track with available data. Case counts in Alabama and Texas, for example, have mostly been rising so R(e) is very likely above 1. And where are the rest of the states? @C_R_Watson 2/
The analysis is trying to suggest that reopening is safe or even preferred. But most states are rightly moving cautiously. I wouldn’t expect to see a spike from eg opening trails, so it makes sense that trends from pre-reopening wld continue. That's on purpose. 3/
I think it’s fine to track R(e). There are epi modeling groups that have a long history of expertise and do this very well. You’ll notice uncertainty is a key feature of the visualizations on this site. 4/4
You can follow @cmyeaton.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.