Last year you called nuclear “extremely dangerous, expensive & time-consuming”
& unnecessary for most nations
In December, Germany closed a nuclear plant that could have kept running for decades.
Now, you’re criticizing it for replacing it with this new coal plant
Words matter, and you are a very influential young woman.
Had you joined our pro-nuclear protests in Germany, and defended rather than attacked nuclear, Germany might still be operating the Phillipsburg nuclear plant, and abandoned the new Uniper coal plant
Also in December, your home country of Sweden unnecessarily closed a nuclear reactor by imposing a massive tax on it.
Had you spoken out in defense of nuclear, rather than attacked it, the reactor might still be producing zero-emissions power.
Nuclear scores highest on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria:
- least CO2
- only waste stored at site of production rather than emitted into environment
- most regulated
- only energy that can end poverty & reduce humankind’s environmental footprint
“If you needed proof that their words and promises were empty, this is it.”
So true, Greta. So true.
You can follow @ShellenbergerMD.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.