This is a body appointed by Facebook to take on a role defined by Facebook on Facebook’s terms. It has just tweeted that it will not make its first rulings till ‘late fall’ ie after the presidential election. Does anybody spot a problem here?
I would really appreciate a public discussion that includes people I know & respect who are part of this. Inc what this means? ‘We don’t expect the Board to regularly share opinions outside of our decisions’??? @HelleThorning_S @arusbridger @jamalgreene @JulieOwono @nighatdad
My understanding is that this is Nick Clegg’s latest Great Idea. The same Nick Clegg who wrote this breathtaking piece of propaganda last week. On what terms were the members engaged? Have you signed contracts? Are you being paid?
What does it mean you’re not ‘expected’ to share opinions? Why are you only addressing content? Why not a wider consideration of Facebook harms? What about about comments y’day from @rashadrobinson @JGreenblattADL @DerrickNAACP ?
You can follow @carolecadwalla.
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.
Enjoy Threader? Sign up.
Since you’re here...
... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.