Stephanie Hurlburt
+ Your AuthorsArchive @sehurlburt Businesses: @_binomial @artbysehurlburt Instagram: 🏳️‍🌈 She/her Dec. 17, 2020 1 min read

Thinking on home security systems. Here's the deal, because of my experience with DV, I'd want one that could never be used against me-- including by someone I gave inside access to. I think this rules out a lot of camera & remote systems. Might have to go back in time tech-wise

Right now I'm not doing any except locks on doors. That ones comforting. If someone locks me out, okay, I can figure out that problem. The exploitation would be someone breaking a window or breaking down a door, a risk I prefer to an inside-job DV-style attacker. I'll think on it

I watched this youtube video where the lady's home security system included cameras that could see into the bedrooms. I don't think I'd *ever* be comfortable with that, no matter what the intended use. The best security is no data at all, not well-intentioned data.

My line of thinking feels against the norm, yet in many ways it's far more rational than the norm's threat model. I believe data shows the biggest safety threat to the average person is someone who was or is close to them, not a rando burglar. We want to ignore high DV rates.

You can follow @sehurlburt.


Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Since you’re here...

... we’re asking visitors like you to make a contribution to support this independent project. In these uncertain times, access to information is vital. Threader gets 1,000,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Your financial support will help two developers to keep working on this app. Everyone’s contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support Threader by becoming premium or by donating on PayPal. Thank you.

Follow Threader